During the last few months, there have been a number of articles in the news about leaders and their compensation. In March, I did a post about an article that showed statistics stating that CEO compensation increase for new CEOs had only increased by 1.5% in 2011 compared to 11% in 2010. This was significantly down from past years even though their performance had improved and the performance of the company had improved.
I did a post about Carmelo Anthony because he was paid a high salary to help the New York Knicks become a top team and win a championship. The organization has not been as successful as expected since he joined the team and they have paid him a very high salary for results.
Once again there was an article in the news about compensation and performance. The Wall Street Journal article CEOs That Delivered The Most And Least Bang For The Buck by Joann S. Lublin and Dana Mattioli stated, “A Wall Street Journal analysis of compensation data for 300 top U.S. companies assembled by Hay Group found that while pay generally tracked performance last year, some CEOs delivered far more bang for the buck when it came to shareholder returns.”
The article went on to explain that although the results discussed in the March article showed that in many cases the compensation during the last year was equilivalent to performance, there were also companies that didn’t follow suit with compensation based on performance. The article explained the stories of four CEOs that were significantly underpaid or overpaid. The graphic above shows some of the statistics related to the performance and compensation based on the CEO.
[Read more…] about Should Leaders Be Paid Based On Performance?






